True Inconvenience

Current talk around town:conclusions on thermometer readings over the
Liberal Man on the street: "Have you heard thepast century, along with "ancient climate records,"
latest news? In 10 years we are all going to dieincluding tree-ring studies and ice-core samples
unless we do something! You have got to go seethat revealed hot and cold spells and airborne
Gore's movie, he proves for sure that the earthparticulates over a 700-year period. In addition,
is headed for certain disaster, and we are tothey created 1,000 computer-based weather
blame."simulations for the past 1,000 years.
Conservative Skeptic: "Wait a minute, you went"Ancient and modern evidence suggest limits to
and paid five dollars to see a movie, and now youfuture global warming," the study concluded. It
are convinced we are all doomed?"was published in the journal Nature. The topic of
Liberal Man on the street: "You must be one ofglobal warming, meanwhile, will be framed
those uninformed conservatives that are comingdramatically in "An Inconvenient Truth," a
from a political perspective, this is a serious moral94-minute documentary featuring former Vice
issue and you are just far too closed minded toPresident Al Gore, who has deemed rising
understand."temperatures "a planetary emergency." The
Conservative Skeptic: "Isn't Al Gore a possibleHollywood production will be released to theaters
candidate in the next presidential election?"in May and is billed by producer Davis Guggenheim
Liberal Man on the street: "Believe what you wantas "the most terrifying film you will ever see." (
to believe, obviously you have already made upThe Washintion Times, April 21, 2006)
your mind, this conversation is over."Furthermore, the official thermometers at the U.S.
That's just the approach Gore takes. "The debateNational Climate Data Center show a "slight global
is over." Anyone who questions what he presentscooling trend over the last seven years '98-'06." (
in his movie is part of a small group of right wingIf It Is Warmer, What is Causing it?
nuts who have no credibility, and are not worthIce core samples show that there is nothing
talking to. That's really convenient! Make a claimunusual about the Earth getting warmer at this
that you hold the "truth," just don't question it. Ipoint in time... Climate change, even drastic climate
personally do not remember this approach being achange is nothing new on planet Earth. There are
part of the scientific method.natural causes to consider as possible reasons for
In this paper I will first address Gore'scurrent climate change.
methodology of using observable changing effectsRecent studies of the effect on sun cycles and
in the environment as conclusive proof that manclimate change can not be cast aside. The ice
is the cause of these effects. I have had far toocaps on Mars have been melting in unison with the
many conversations with people who continuallyEarth's. Scientists know that the cause for this is
refer to the ice caps melting as proof that man isthe fact that the Sun goes through hot and cold
the bad guy. Second, I want to address the issuecycles, and for the past 11 years the sun has
of whether the debate is over, as Gore and hisbeen getting warmer. There are highly credible
followers quickly retreat to when questioned. Iscientists who feel that the sun cycles may be
would like to show that there is not anything likepart of our current warming trend.
"consensus" as to whether the effects sited asRichard Willson, a Columbia University researcher
evidence are even caused by global warming, letalso affiliated with NASA's Goddard Institute for
alone consensus on man being the cause. Third, ISpace Studies, is quoted as follows:
will give a small history on science predictingIn what could be the simplest explanation for one
climate change.component of global warming, a new study
Basic Premises of Goreologyshows the Sun's radiation has increased by .05
After reading Gore's previous work, Earth in thepercent per decade since the late 1970s. "Solar
Balance, watching three current Gore interviews,activity has apparently been going upward for a
reading six movie reviews, and one thoroughcentury or more," Willson told today. Further
examination of Gore's website, two ideas clearlysatellite observations may eventually show the
appear. First, that the global warming debate istrend to be short-term. But if the change has
over, and any dissenters are nut balls. Secondindeed persisted at the present rate through the
that there is overwhelming consensus in the20th Century, "it would have provided a significant
scientific community with regards to man beingcomponent of the global warming the
the cause of global warming. As proof, GoreIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
presents a variety of possible effects of globalreports to have occurred over the past 100
warming as conclusive evidence of man as theyears," he said. (Space and Science, March 20,
cause of global warming.2003)
The following statements can be found on the AlDr. Mukul Sharma, Assistant Professor of Earth
Gore Inconvenient Truth website, which clearlyScience at Dartmouth College, is quoted as
outlines Gore's position:follows:
The website lists four examples in support of thisThe National Center for Atmospheric Research in
alarming news: Notice that none of theseBoulder has recently stated:
examples of "undeniable" evidence linking man to"Solar scientists think they're finally getting a
climate change in any way. In fact, thesehandle on predicting the Sun's cycles. If everything
examples may not even be effects of globalgoes as they predict, the next solar cycle will be
warming, as I will demonstrate later.30-50% stronger, and be up to a year late.
1. The number of category 4 and 5 hurricanesAstronomers have been tracking the two major
has almost doubled in the last 30 years.flows of plasma that govern the Sun's cycles. One
2. Malaria has spread to higher altitudes in placesacts like a conveyor belt, pulling plasma from the
like the Colombian Andes.poles to the equator, and the other gets
3. The flow of ice from glaciers in Greenland hasstretched since the Sun rotates faster at the
more than doubled over the past decade.equator than at the poles. This causes the Sun's
4. At least 279 species of plants and animals aremagnetic field to concentrate, creating the solar
already responding to global warming, movingmaximum." (Universe Today, March 6, 2006)
closer to the poles.We must conclude that sun cycles are connected
Effects Used as Causesto the climate on Earth. To what degree it is
The problem with the methodology used by Goreunclear, and the science is rather new, but we
to acquire his "undeniable evidence" is, as I statedcannot easily dismiss the possibility that the sun
previously, that these are all possible effects ofcould be a grater influence than man concerning
global warming, and not overwhelming evidenceclimate change.
that man has caused global warming. ThisThere is a host of other facts that show that
intellectual swindle is used all the time, not just bymany of the effects sited by Gore may not be
Gore, but by the environmental movement incaused by global warming. According to the
general. I have watched numerous shows andcurrent National Hurricane Center website:
read countless articles that site changing effects inThey site the fact that hurricane patterns are
the environment as evidence of man causingnormal, and that there have been other active
global warming. This is a slight of hand that peoplephases including the one between 1945-1970.
need to be conscious of. It is one thing to say,Gore would have us believe otherwise.
"the Earth's climate is changing," and quite anotherAs well, Mr. Richard Lindzen, Professor of
that "man has caused the change." I would agreeAtmospheric Science at MIT does not share in
that it has been proven that the Earth's climatethe certainty of Goreology. Writing in the Wall
changes, and to state otherwise would beStreet Journal's Op Ed, July 2, 2006, he states:
ludicrous. But this is not Gore's premise. Gore isThe other elements of the global-warming scare
putting forth the proposition that because thescenario are predicated on similar oversights.
Earth's climate is changing, man must be theMalaria, claimed as a byproduct of warming, was
cause. It is quite disingenuous of Mr. Gore: to use,once common in Michigan and Siberia and remains
at best, possible effects of global warming ascommon in Siberia -- mosquitoes don't require
conclusive evidence of man's causation of climatetropical warmth. [Malaria has been on the rise in
change. It is simply intellectually dishonest.general, ever since the banning of DDT, my note.]
While Gore's use of computer simulations can riseHurricanes, too, vary on multidecadal time scales;
quite a bit of emotion, it can hardly contribute tosea-surface temperature is likely to be an
proving man as the cause. The most fundamentalimportant factor. This temperature, itself, varies
starting point of computer generated doomsdayon multidecadal time scales. However, questions
fortunetelling is "IF," followed by "possible." "IF"concerning the origin of the relevant sea-surface
such and such continues, than maybe such andtemperatures and the nature of trends in
such will possibly occur. This is a big "IF" followedhurricane intensity are being hotly argued within
by a little "p," as in little possibility that a rationalthe profession [my emphasis]. Even among those
mind can accept this as conclusive, undeniablearguing, there is general agreement that we can't
evidence that man is the cause of the currentattribute any particular hurricane to global warming
climate change. I perceive far more politics than I[my emphasis]. To be sure, there is one
do science in Gore's statements.exception: Greg Holland of the National Center for
Not Quite a "Consensus"Atmospheric Research in Boulder, CO., who
Gore has made the bold claim that the debateargues that it must be global warming because he
about man causing global warming is over. He hascan't think of anything else. While arguments like
painted the picture that the only people that stillthese, based on lassitude, are becoming rather
question this are a discredited minority.common in climate assessments, such claims,
The following are findings and statements fromgiven the primitive state of weather and climate
various individual scientist and scientific institutionsscience, are hardly compelling.
that show clearly that Mr. Gore is simply incorrect.In his film, Gore points to Mt. Kilimanjaro as an
A challenger to Gore's "consensus" theory isexample of global warning's impact on Alpine
Professor Bob Carter of the Marine Geophysicalglaciers. Robert Balling, a climatologist at Arizona
Laboratory at James Cook University, Australia.State University writes, however, that the
He recently stated:shrinking glaciers atop Africa's famed volcano
Gore's circumstantial arguments are so weak thathave been disappearing for more than a century.
they are pathetic. It is simply incredible that hisTwo studies published in 2004 suggest the retreat
film is commanding public attention.was triggered by declining rainfall since the end of
(Newsmax.com)the 1800.
Famed climatologist and internationally renownedArizona Moon Landing
hurricane expert Dr. William Gray, of theIn Gore's interview with Charlie Rose, Rose asks,
Atmospheric-Science Department at Colorado"do you know any credible scientist who says
State University, went even further, calling the'wait a minute - this hasn't been proven,' is there
scientific "consensus" on global warming "one ofstill a debate?" Al Gore answers, "The debate is
the greatest hoaxes ever perpetrated on theover. The people who dispute the international
American people." (Newsmax.com)consensus on global warming are in the same
Is It Warmer Now? Warmer Than When?category now with the people who think the
The first thing we need to consider is that whenmoon landing was staged on a movie lot in
we compare the Earth's climate over the pastArizona." (PBS, Charlie Rose, June 19, 2006)
600 years, the 20th Century was warmer byI guess we should put the National Hurricane
about one degree. However, if we look back aCenter; the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
little further in time, the Earth's climate wasAdministration; Doctor Lindzen, Professor of
actually warmer 1,000 years ago, at the time ofAtmospheric Science at MIT; Professor Bob
Viking exploration, than it has been during ourCarter of the Marine Geophysical Lapidary at
lifetimes. And back then, human beings were notJames Cook University, Australia; Dr. William Gray
causing global warming by burning huge amountsof the Atmospheric-Science Department at
of natural gas or oil. This "Medieval Warm Period"Colorado State University; The National Academy
from about 800 to 1300 A.D. was entirely natural.of Science; Sen. James Inhofe, Chairman of the
It was followed by a "little ice age," which wasEnvironment and Public Works Committee;
followed by the warming period we currently liveNational Science Foundation; Robert Balling,
in. So there have been both warmer and colderClimatologist at Arizona State University; the
times in the past.National Climate Data Center; and Dr. Fred Singer,
The National Academy of Science recently issuedDirector of the National Weather Satellite Center...
a report addressing the "hockey stick" studyin with Al's "moon group."
produced by Dr. David Mann and used in Gore'sPast Climate-Change Beliefs
movie, which claims to prove that the Earth'sLet's keep in mind that this is not the first time
temperature is skyrocketing. Sen. James Inhofe,we have been warned about imminent
R-Okla., chairman of the Committee oncatastrophic climate changes. Here are a few
Environment and Public Works, said in a statementexamples:
Thursday,The world's climatologists are agreed that we
Today's NAS report reaffirms what I have beenmust prepare for the next ice age. (Science
saying all along, that Mann's "hockey stick" isMagazine, December 10, 1976)
broken. Today's report refutes Mann's priorThere are ominous signs that the Earth's weather
assertions that there was no Medieval Warmpatterns have begun to change dramatically and
Period or Little Ice Age. (Newsmax.com)that these changes may portend a drastic decline
The NAS report also stated that there arein food production- with serious political implications
substantial uncertaintiesregarding Mann's claimsfor just about every nation on Earth. The drop in
that the last few decades of the 20th centuryfood output could begin quite soon, perhaps only
were the warmest in last 1,000 years.10 years from now. The regions destined to feel
(Newsmax.com)its impact are the great wheat-producing lands of
In a recent interview by News Max, Dr. FredCanada and the U.S.S.R. in the North, along with a
Singer, former director of the National Weathernumber of marginally self-sufficient tropical areas -
Satellite Center and author of Hot Talk, Coldparts of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Indochina and
Science: Global Warning's Unfinished Debate, pointsIndonesia - where the growing season is
out that:dependent upon the rains brought by the
The atmosphere changes. Sure, there is globalmonsoon. (April 28, 1975 Newsweek article on
warming; however, there is also global cooling. Inglobal cooling)
the last century we had:The Institute for Space Studies, Goddard Space
· a warming trend before 1940Flight Center, National Aeronautics and Space
· a cooling trend between 1940 and 1975Administration, stated:
· a warming trend between 1975 andEffects on the global temperature of large
1980increases in carbon dioxide and aerosol densities in
· And essentially NO trend for the last 20the atmosphere of Earth have been computed. It
years.is found that, although the addition of carbon
Real scientists tell us the sun has an 11-year cycledioxide in the atmosphere does increase the
and you clearly see this in some of thesurface temperature, the rate of temperature
temperature records.increase diminishes with increasing carbon dioxide
The article continues:in the atmosphere. For aerosols, however, the net
Proponents of Al's fiction often cite the list ofeffect of increase in density is to reduce the
"2,500 scientists" who subscribe to the Goresurface temperature of Earth. Because of the
concept of global warming. Singer says: "That isexponential dependence of the backscattering, the
not really true. You hear about 2,500 scientistsrate of temperature decrease is augmented with
who worked on this report for the United Nations.increasing aerosol content. An increase by only a
First of all, the number is less than 2,000 andfactor of 4 in global aerosol background
secondly, of these, perhaps 100 are qualified toconcentration may be sufficient to reduce the
say something about the climate ... and they havesurface temperature by as much as 3.5 ° K.
never been polled."If sustained over a period of several years, such
On the other side of the coin (which you nevera temperature decrease over the whole globe is
hear about), there are some 17,000 for-realbelieved to be sufficient to trigger an ice age.
scientists who say global warming is a hoax. And(Science Magazine, July 9, 1971)
17,000 "actually signed a petition against theI grew up during the 1970s and can remember
Kyoto protocol."vividly the fearful atmosphere that was created
...there is a debate going on ... and the public isby scientists and the media concerning the
entitled to know that there is a debate and thatdisastrous ice age that was about to engulf
the debate is not finished.humanity. Acid rain was going to eat my eyes
...Referenc[ing] the U.N. report. The summaryout. Seriously, I can remember many of my
doesn't say 'Jack' about weather satellitesclassmates and myself being afraid to go out in
collecting data about the atmosphere. One wouldthe rain, because of the acid that would burn our
think that weather satellites are the mostskin. During the winter of 1976-77 the Mississippi
important data-gathering instrument we have. It isRiver froze shut; Buffalo, N.Y., was buried beneath
the only thing that collects data on a worldwidea record blizzard; water pipes were bursting
basis. The fact that satellites are collecting data isthroughout Chicago, as the soil froze to a depth
not even mentioned.of more than five feet; and scientists and the
You know why? Because the satellite data showsmedia warned to prepare for the worst.
that the atmosphere is NOT warming. THAT isAl Gore is not the first to propagate doomsday
why it is not even mentioned. And yes, that is ahysteria. These scenarios and the belief that man
for-real empirical "inconvenient truth."is the cause of weather conditions are as old as
(Newsmax.com, June 5, 2006)humanity. Magic men of the past, as well as
Recent findings by a Duke University study,today, believe that we have angered the gods
conducted by Dr. Gabriele Hegerl, and endorsedthrough our actions. This idea is often used for
by the National Oceanic and Atmosphericpolitical purposes. In today's times, we have Gaia
Adminastration, the Department of Energy, andthe Earth Goddess, who is going to unleash her
the National Science Foundation, fly in the face ofwrath through global warming because of our
what Gore is attempting to convince people of.capitalism. Only the high priests of science and Al
The Duke research found:Gore hold the keys to our salvation.
...substantial ups and downs in the Earth'sToward the end of the Middle Ages we had a
temperature before modern times, counteringlittle ice age that most people believed to be
other studies that confine noticeable temperaturecaused by man's sin. During this same period
increases to the industrialized era. Marked climateplague hit Europe. People did not understand the
change in other centuries resulted from "externalsource, and panic spread faster than the disease.
forcing," said the Duke findings, citing volcanicBelieving that the end of the world was at hand,
eruptions and other influences.wandering mobs began to focus their wrath upon
"Our reconstruction supports a lot of variability inclergy and Jews, whom they blamed for inciting
the past," said research director Gabriele Hegerl ofGod's wrath. In Germany rumors arose that Jews
Duke's Nicholas School of the Environment andhad caused the plague by poisoning the water...
Earth Sciences.Jews were arrested. Their fortunes were seized
Although her study found that the Earth is,by the lords under whose jurisdictions they lived,
indeed, warming, Ms. Hegerl discounts direand Jews were put to death by burning.
predictions of skyrocketing temperatures. TheToday it is capitalist Americans, mostly
probability that the climate's "sensitivity" toconservatives, who are accused of destroying the
greenhouse-gas levels would result in drasticallyEarth with cars and massive energy consumption.
higher temperatures is "substantially" reduced, sheThe angry mobs of environmentalists seek to put
said.to death the American way of life, that is based
Ms. Hegerl and her four-member team based theirin the ideas of capitalism and economic growth.